Featured Posts

In the past year, gold has been steadily climbing, central banks have been buying at record levels, and the macro setup could be pointing to its biggest move in decades. But, it doesn't seem like investors aren’t paying attention. Stocks dominate the headlines, and gold still carries

Markets are trying to recover after last week’s selloff, but the gains are small. As of this morning, the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 are both up just 0.03%, the Dow is up 0.11%, and crude oil is climbing 0.2%. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq 100

The market’s winning streak just hit a roadblock. Trump’s latest tariff threats, floating a 25% tax on auto, semiconductor, and pharmaceutical imports are shaking stocks today. With growing inflation concerns, market's are guessing whether this could push back Fed rate cuts in 2025. Here’s what’

I used to think I could outsmart the market by buying at rock-bottom and selling at the peak. I’d try to pinpoint those perfect days when stocks were at their lowest, and then cash out before the next downturn. But over time I learned that chasing those 'magic&

Every time the market rallies to new highs, people start asking the same question: Are we in a bubble?
And every time, the answer is basically the same: maybe, but we won’t know until it pops. That’s how bubbles work. They never feel obvious in real-time.
The 1999 Dot-Com bubble? It was justified by “the new economy.”
The 2008 housing bubble? It was considered a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to buy real estate with no money down.
Every cycle has its own version of “this time is different.”
Can US Stocks Keep Dominating?
Let’s start with an undeniable fact: US stocks have dominated the market for the last 15 years.
If you compare the performance of the MSCI USA index to the MSCI World index (which includes all developed markets), you see a trend:
Back in 2010, when the market was still recovering from the financial crisis, the ratio of US to global stocks performance sat at 0.88—basically, US stocks were underperforming the rest of the world.
Fast forward to today, and that number has exploded to 1.49, meaning US stocks have significantly outpaced the rest of the world’s markets.

The big question is: why?
Is it because US companies are fundamentally better than the rest of the world? Or is this just the result of easy monetary policy, trillions in stimulus, and US tech stocks? History suggests that markets tend to cycle. Leadership rotates and outperformance reverts.
My assumption is that this can’t go on forever. The ratio itself has a natural cap—US stocks can’t make up 100% of global market cap. But the real concern isn’t just that US stocks have gone up—it’s that investors are treating US stocks as the only opportunity available.
US Stocks Are Historically Expensive
Valuations are used as a red flag for market bubbles. But lately, valuation metrics feel like background noise. Everyone acknowledges them, but no one seems to care.
The Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings (CAPE) ratio, is a version of the P/E ratio that smooths out earnings over a 10-year period to account for economic cycles.
Right now, it sits at 37.97, a level we’ve only seen twice before: right before the 1929 crash and at the peak of the Dot-Com bubble.

For reference, the historical average is between 15-16
It feels like the market's accepted a different narrative: maybe the old rules don’t apply anymore.
How Might a Market Crash Look?
Let’s say we are in a bubble. What would cause it to pop?
It probably wouldn’t be valuations alone. Markets don’t collapse just because they’re expensive–they collapse when something shifts sentiment.
In 2000, it was the realization that most Dot-Com companies had no profits. In 2008, it was the realization that mortgage-backed securities were toxic.
So what’s the potential cause today? A Fed-induced liquidity crunch? A slowdown in corporate earnings? A loss of faith in AI return on investment?
Are We in a Bubble? Maybe.
If you’re looking at valuations, the case for a bubble is strong. Stocks are trading near their most expensive levels in history and US markets have gone nearly 15 years without any real mean reversion compared to the rest of the world.
But if you ask today’s investors, they’ll tell you that valuations are outdated, that the market has fundamentally changed, that things like passive investing, technology, and globalization have altered the old rules.
Do you think this time is different?